2751 E Oakland Park Blvd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306
The proposed layout as drafted. Shows the restrooms, owner’s office, kitchen with the new L-shaped wall, the 14-ft caster bar (movable equipment, N.I.C.), seating arrangement, and pergola lounge. Open the PDF for full vector resolution.

Download Proposed Floor Plan (PDF)
| Address / Folio | 2751 E Oakland Park Blvd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306 · Folio 4942-24-03-0050. The building was originally filed in 1965 under 2749 E Oak Pk Blvd; the bay was renumbered to 2751 later. |
|---|---|
| Legal description | East ½ of Lot E, less the South 50 ft, Block 13, Coral Ridge Galt Addition No. 3 (PB 35, Pg 47, Broward County). Lot dimensions of record: 50 × 150 ft (per master permit p0022 + McLaughlin survey 4/2/1965, p0023). |
| Year built | 1965. Certificate of Occupancy #5388 issued October 19, 1965. |
| Construction type / classification | CBS — concrete block, stucco exterior. Reinforced-concrete foundation. Classified Type II construction, Group G, Fire Zone 2 per 1965 South Florida Building Code (City plan check, p0024). |
| Structure / age uniformity | 2751 and the adjoining 2747 bay were built as one structure in a single 1965 construction event. Demising wall is 8-inch CMU. Structural system and age uniform across the suite. |
| Original permits (1965) | Building FL-65-4067 · Roof FL-65-4068 · Original A/C permit #9484 (3-ton electric rooftop, Air Conditioning Associates, 7/28/1965). Architect: Richard A. Baker. Original GC: Sepper Development Co. |
| Existing interior layout | Current interior partition layout is a 1982 tenant build-out (Chisholm Realty, permit #82-7116, Robert Brewster Construction). It is not original 1965 fabric — existing non-structural partitions are 1982-era. |
|---|---|
| Original fire-rating regime (1965) | 1965 plan check (p0024) required 1-hour fire-rated interior partitions and 1-hour fire-rated ceiling throughout. |
| Drainage | 4″ cast-iron soil stack present; visually confirmed at three points. Note: the landlord is replacing the cast-iron sanitary line on a separate permit (see Section C scope split). |
| Existing customer restroom | Small CMU-bound room, ~52.75″ × 59.5″. Being reworked under this permit (see Section C.3) — not turn-key. |
| Abandoned storage-room plumbing | Behind the customer-restroom wall — retains drain rough-in plus copper supply routed to attic. Reuse path for the required FDACS mop / service sink (see C.4). |
| Water heater | No existing WH. Attic space directly above both bathrooms is the install location; the dedicated circuit already exists. New unit will be installed (see C.5). |
| Electrical — original 1965 service | 400 Amp main, dual metering, EMT wiring (per p0024). Service has since been downsized; the external “2751 A” panel (Section E, item 2) is likely a vestige of that original 400A configuration. |
| Electrical — current main panel | Frank Adam, 125A, 20 slots (16 used, 4 spare). Installed 2008 (Albert Siefert, EC0002423, permit PM-08120788). |
| Item | Whose scope |
|---|---|
| Cast-iron sanitary line replacement + toilet flange set | Landlord (separate permit). Awa Na Kava relays flange position to landlord’s plumber as a one-line ask. |
| All other wall plumbing (lavatory, mop sink), water heater install, electrical, partitions, finishes, kitchen wall | Awa Na Kava — this permit, IDB (CGC1514991) as GC of record. |
| 14-ft caster bar | Awa Na Kava — movable equipment, N.I.C. (shown on plans, not as construction). See C.6. |
The major new construction. New L-shaped kitchen wall with the plumbing and electrical feeding into that wall. See Section H (Proposed Designs — Kitchen) for layout intent.
Existing CMU-bound room (~52.75″ × 59.5″) cannot meet full 60″ ADA clearance / turning space; CMU walls are a hard structural constraint. The restroom proceeds as maximum extent feasible per ADA §202.3 / FBC-EB §306.6. Sealed technical-infeasibility memo accompanies the set, citing Access Board Guide to ADA Standards Ch. 2 (Feb. 2014) and DOJ Title II preamble on plumbing-wall infeasibility.
Governing codes: 2010 ADA Standards · FBC-Accessibility 2023 · FBC-Building 2023 · FBC-Plumbing 2023 · FBC-Existing Building 2023 (8th ed.) · ICC A117.1-2017.
| Water closet (toilet) | Floor-mounted, standard (not wall-hung — no clearance benefit per §604.3.1). Flange centerline 17″ ± ½″ from side wall (target; code-allowed range 16″ min to 18″ max per §604.2). This is mandatory — the landlord is fully re-running the cast-iron drain, so the prior “can’t move the toilet” constraint is removed; centerline must be brought to compliance. Set against the 59.5″ wall (rear); open/transfer side toward door — left vs. right side wall is a layout choice. Seat 17–19″ AFF. Side grab bar 42″ min (33–36″ AFF, 12″ max from rear wall, §604.5.1); rear grab bar 36″ min (§604.5.2); solid blocking during drywall. Hard checkpoint: once the slab closes, flange position is locked — written rough-in dimension to the landlord’s plumber before slab closure. The one-line ask to landlord PM: “When the new flange is set, place centerline 17″ off the [chosen] side wall.” No wall plumbing, no added cost — lateral position on a drain being re-laid anyway. |
|---|---|
| Lavatory (Awa Na Kava plumber) | Wall-mount corner sink, min footprint, tucked into corner. Must sit outside the WC clear floor space (§606.2) but may overlap turning space + its own approach. Rim ≤ 34″ AFF (§606.3); knee clearance 27″ h × 8″ deep (§306.3); toe 9″ h (§306.2). Forward approach 30″ × 48″. Lever or touchless faucet (§309.4). §606.5 pipe protection: supply + drain + P-trap insulated (foam wraps, Truebro/Lav-Guard), no sharp/abrasive surfaces. Rough-in (Awa Na Kava’s plumber, stub from wall at corner): drain branch + vent stubbed at corner; hot/cold supply stub-outs at corner — confirm wall vs. floor routing with plumber (do not assume); heights set so finished rim ≤ 34″; pipe insulation per §606.5. |
| Door | Existing 24″ door widened to 32″ in the ~36″ wall-to-wall hallway (34″ rough opening + casing fits). Nets ~30″ clear — under the 32″-clear new-build standard, documented as maximum extent feasible (widening further would require relocating the EP-panel wall + electrical — disproportionate / not pursued). Door swings outward (or sliding) to eliminate the in-swing maneuvering-clearance conflict (§603.2.3). Annotate “max extent feasible” on the plan with the constraint noted. |
| Clear floor space & approach | WC: 56″ deep provided (have 59.5″) + max achievable open-side width (~35.75″). Open-side shortfall vs. 60″ documented as max-extent-feasible departure. Lav approach may overlap WC clearance + turning space (§606.2 allows). |
| Restroom count | One single-user accessible unisex restroom. FBC-Plumbing 2023 permits a single-user room “available to all persons regardless of sex” to count toward the required fixtures provided occupant load supports it (Group B / <50). The constrained 52.75″ × 59.5″ room does not auto-force a second restroom at this occupant load; Jim confirms against the occupant-load calc. |
| Verify on the drawn geometry (Jim) |
• Corner lavatory + its 30″ × 48″ approach must not push the WC off the 17″ centerline. • Supply-line routing for the lavatory is a plumber-scope confirmation (wall vs. floor) — get the “yes” before travel. • Door swing must clear maneuvering space inside the room. |
Required — the §422.7 occupant-load ≤ 15 service-sink exemption is Business/Mercantile only, and a beverage use plans on needing it. Show on drawings reusing the abandoned storage-room plumbing behind the customer-restroom wall (see B above).
No existing WH. Install in attic space directly above both bathrooms. Dedicated circuit already exists (Nick will supply circuit details — see top note).
Note — correct any prior “built-in bar” assumption: the bar is not fixed construction. It is movable equipment.
14-ft single solid top on lockable rolling casters. Not a fixed/built partition. Show on drawings as movable equipment / N.I.C., not as construction. To hold that classification it: is not anchored to floor or walls; carries no plumbing and no hardwired electrical (cord-and-plug only); is positioned so it does not block required egress width or the accessible route.
Strings that still attach despite “movable”:
Synthesis of the items that must appear on the stamped set:
For alignment of expectations — the stamped set is anticipated to include:
Proposed use: botanical / kava beverage lounge. No alcohol. No commercial cooking — plug-in appliances only. The following govern:
These two items are not yet confirmed and should be resolved on-site before drawings are locked:
Download this brief (Word .docx)
Seven original 1965 microfilm pages from the City of Fort Lauderdale records — the source of record for Sections A and B. Click any image for full resolution.
Direct site documentation. Captions are field observations. Photos relevant to the field-verify items (panels, the unidentified pipe, the soil stack, the water-heater supply routing, the storage-room rough-in) are grouped by area.

































Houzz/3D layout exports showing design intent for each area. Reference only; the as-stamped drawings govern. Click any image for full resolution.
Source note: Building identity, vintage, permit, and structural facts are from the recorded 1965 City of Fort Lauderdale microfilm (Section F). Existing-condition facts and site photos are from direct site observation. Restroom configuration is documented as maximum extent feasible per ADA §202.3 / FBC-EB §306.6; a sealed technical-infeasibility memo accompanies the permit set (cite Access Board Guide to ADA Standards Ch. 2 (Feb. 2014) + DOJ Title II preamble on plumbing-wall infeasibility). Calculated items (occupant load, life-safety thresholds) are engineering estimates for your confirmation, not authority determinations.